Recently, I had a reader (and prospective FSO candidate) ask me for some input in choosing between the Consular and Polical career tracks (or "cones," as we dinosaurs know them).
With his or her permission, I post the following:
My advice about choosing career tracks (or "cones") is
to pick the one in which you think you will be happiest working during the next
few decades.
Not everyone actually stays in the FS for a career, but if
you're making the effort to join in the first place, that's how you should
plan.
Some people give more weight to things like opportunities for
rapid advancement (for values of "rapid"), likelihood of becoming an
ambassador, &tc.
As for me, as a potential colleague, neighbor, and/or future
supervisor, I would rather you picked the cone in which you would not be
miserable working year-after-year-after-decade.
Not that there aren't "interfunctional" assignments.
Not that you can't work "out-of-cone" from time to time
(although doing too much of that can detract from your chances for promotion).
But you should at least like your home career track.
Your specific questions, on the other hand, were more targeted:
"Please tell me why you enjoy the consular track, and what you feel
are the advantages of it over the political track?"
I initially chose Consular because I wanted to be able to help
my fellow citizens abroad. Consular work has not only provided me with
ample opportunities to successfully fulfill that ambition but, post-9/11, to
materially contribute to national security through the visa process.
Consular officers (similar to MGT cone) also have opportunities
to manage/lead people and resources much earlier than do Political or Econ cone
officers.
You also stated "I have also read there are more positions
for consular FSO's."
That is true in the entry level grades, but may not be true in
terms of actual numbers hired. Virtually every new FSO does at least one
year of consular work during one of their first two overseas tours, many of
them do two years or even two entire tours of consular work before getting a
job in their actual non-Consular career track. This is simply because, at
the entry-level, consular work is where the need for officers is greatest.
But in consular work, like a pyramid, the cone is broadest at
the base, among the vice consuls. That pyramid narrows considerably as it
tapers upwards, so that non-Consular FSOs aren't forced to work (or bid on)
mid-grade (or higher) Consular positions unless they want to do so.
In Political work, the need is fairly narrow at the entry-level
"base" of the cone before bulges outward in the mid-grades. So
most Political career track FSOs have very little opportunity to work in their
home "cone" until they reach mid-grade ranks after receiving tenure.
This means they probably spend most of their first four years or so
working in either Consular or Management positions.
Hope this helps!
2 comments:
Your advice is completely correct: choose the cone in which you think you will most enjoy the work. Although doing a little research about what the work actually entails in each specialization is not a bad idea either.
About 20 years ago someone had the bright idea that applicants didn't really know what work they would enjoy in the Foreign Service - so they brought in unconed JOs and waited until tenuring to decide what cones they would be assigned to. This happened during a period when the FS was barely hiring, but the Consular work is a constant at the entry level: ie three or four years consular in the first two tours was pretty much the norm.
AFSA ran a survey and found that about 70-75% of the JOs thought they should be reporting officers; about 20-25% wanted to do consular work; which left 5% for admin/management. (USIA was still independent.) Somehow spending three years on the visa line didn't change people's opinions. So do your research before you join.
For whatever it's worth, here's my pitch for public diplomacy work: you have management responsibilities like the Consular and Management officers; you have to know at least the quick version of all the policy issues in order to deal with the press; you do more representational events then any other cone; and you have opportunities to be creative. On the other hand, if you don't enjoy standing in front of people talking - it may not be a good fit.
What do the economic people do cause that was where I tried to go before I failed.
Post a Comment