Nahal Toosi at Politico ("We reach the most influential people in the country") did a nice piece of writing here.
Money quote(s):
"Tillerson notes that nearly 70 special envoy or similar positions exist at the department and that some have outlived their purpose. In many cases, Tillerson argues that existing State Department bureaus will be able to handle the same duties in a more efficient way."
Some of the special envoys duplicate offices or even U.S. ambassadors resident in other countries.
"Tillerson's attempts to reduce the number of special envoys has broad support within the State Department, where many diplomats nonetheless cringe at Trump's proposal to cut their budget by 30 percent. The general feeling is that the envoy positions have proliferated to the point where they are undermining existing State Department regional bureaus and other divisions that do similar work."
Yup. And if eliminating those duplicative positions takes care of some of that 30 percent cut, it may save truly vital functions from getting the ax.
"Some of the special envoy positions are mandated by law, making Tillerson's reorganization process tricky. At the same time, many of the positions are supported by outside advocacy groups who fear that their elimination will undermine efforts to highlight those particular issues."
The articles cites "international labor affairs; cyber issues; rights for the disabled; implementation of the Iran nuclear deal; global youth issues; and the Northern Ireland conflict" specifically as special envoy positions to be eliminated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment