Living the Dream.





Showing posts with label casinos. Show all posts
Showing posts with label casinos. Show all posts

Friday, December 23, 2011

re: "State Dept. Makes Us All Look Stooopid"

The Phibian at Cdr Salamander ("Proactively “From the Sea”; leveraging the littoral best practices for a paradigm breaking six-sigma best business case to synergize a consistent design in the global commons, rightsizing the core values supporting our mission statement via the 5-vector model through cultural diversity.") took objection to remarks by State Dept. spokesperson Victoria Nuland.


Money quote(s):


"The PRC is a sovereign nation with legitimate maritime security requirements that are easily understood by anyone with an even rudimentary understanding of where maritime strategy and commerce come together.


The fact that the DOS would ask this in public does too things; it insults the Chinese through its patronizing tone and it makes our nation look like it is led by arrogant imperialists at best, simpletons at worst."


I wonder if our institutional gobsmackedness on this particular issue is due to the residual embarrassment of those who really believed that the Varyag was actually ever going to be converted into a casino.


I mean, if you believed that one, you'd believe just about anything.


"I find all the wide-eyed panting over the Chinese carrier immature and silly.


It is a limited carrier with a limited airwing. The French CVN Charles de Gualle is a much more capable platform and we have seen what it can do off Libya. Nice, but no biggie.


I am more interested in how we would kill the Chinese carrier if we ever needed to. That is no problem at all.


As a matter of fact - in the case of general war, I would give the job to the Japanese."


Frankly, the Varyag says more about Chinese naval intentions in the longer term than about what they're likely to do with it next week or next year. Clearly it'll be the test bed and school house for development of naval aviation operations over the coming decades.


Perhaps the Chinese have doubts about future U.S. ability to ensure open sealanes. The Chinese economy has become increasingly dependent upon its ability to import raw materials and energy by sea. Developing their own ability to guarantee open sealanes could explain much of this.


"If you want to nibble your nails over the Chinese, then nibble over the multi-axis "Porcupine Strategy" they have for the Taiwan Strait that wants to make the prospect so painful to contemplate that we simply won't go there. They don't need a carrier for that. SS, Houbei Class, ASCM, ASBM, H-6M and other land based long range strike aircraft; that is what you should focus on; that is the challenge. Simple, but in numbers and worth a sober ponder.


Against our carriers coming across the Pacific, they only need to get lucky once; we have to get lucky every time. "





8/13

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

re: "Aircraft Carrier: Chinese Territory In Any Sea"

Michael Mandaville at Big Peace explains why this is important.


Money quote(s):


"The socialist People’s Republic of China is expanding its influence by refurbishing the Varyag, a Soviet era aircraft carrier, renaming it the Shi Lang. The carrier is expected to start sea trials later this year. An aircraft carrier is a strategy to project power far from the homeland. The mere presence of an aircraft carrier has far-reaching effects in the realpolitik between nations. To defend Taiwan, the United States sent aircraft carriers between the island nation and Communist China to warn against aggression. When finished, the Shi Lang is expected to be a formidable presence, especially when combined with other combatants into an anticipated Carrier Battle Group."

Wait a minute! Isn't the Varyag supposed to be converted into a casino? Wasn't that what the end-user certificate said? How in the world were we ever fooled like this by our strategic partners, the Chinese?


"The carrier’s loaded displacement (weight) of 67,000 tons will enable it to host as many as 50 aircraft.


The Chinese Navy has a roughly 75 surface combatants, 60 submarines, more than 50 medium and large amphibious ships, 70 or more missile boats and several hundred patrol craft. The surface combatant contingent primarily consists of Destroyers and Frigates. Most are the Chinese produced Luda or Luhai class with four Russian Sovremmony class destroyers. The frigates, which are smaller but capable ships, are the Jiangwhei and the Jianghu class. These ships are not as advanced as the American Aegis class cruisers but they are stepping stones to more far reaching naval ambitions."

As our navy shrinks, to the point where we have more admirals that ships, the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy grows, ship by ship and capability by capability.


"In 2006, a Chinese submarine stalked an American Carrier. The Chinese Song-class diesel-powered attack submarine trailed the Kitty Hawk battle group which has cruisers, submarines and helicopter anti-submarine detection capability. Undetected, the Song class surfaced within five miles of the carrier – well within the firing range of their Russian wake-homing torpedoes and their anti-ship cruise missiles. The incident proved a keen embarrassment for Admiral Fallon who heads U.S. Forces in the Pacific and has aggressively engaged the Chinese military with exchanges and even invitations to sensitive U.S. military bases. The Chinese have not reciprocated with similar invitations to their military bases, perhaps proving that an American open hand offered in friendship merely shows its Communist adversaries that it holds no weapon. The Song class captain would not have shadowed and embarrassed the U.S. Carrier Battle Group without permission from China’s masters. They did so to prove American vulnerabilities – and perhaps the mettle of their own submarine fleet against the vaunted U.S. Navy. Moments like this allow the PLAN’s leaders to request bigger budgets and prestige within the Communist hierarchy. Now it is they who are confronting the Americans in ‘their’ Pacific ocean."

Can't find fault with that analysis. Keep reading:


"The Chinese have been visiting ports far and wide, including the Gulf of Aden, the Phillipines and even battling Somali pirates on patrol. They are upgrading the carrier for ‘research and training’ purposes according to an article in the Washington Times. The Chinese have been struggling to create a navy beyond their coastal force over the last few decades."


China has been more than a regional naval power in the past, but you have to go back some few centuries to see it. In living memory it just hasn't happened.


This time around they're the new guys on the global block and have something of a learning curve ahead to master all the interolocking and moving pieces that come together to generate naval force projectiong. But they've gotten started.


"I discovered the demographics intertwined with economics driving the Chinese goal. With a burgeoning population and more than 100 million unemployed, the Communist Party must keep the economy pumping. If not, then social unrest results. For the last four or five years, this social unrest has been percolating and popping across China. The corrupt Communist party officials have routinely ignored the people and the people’s democracy. The PRC has routinely used its security forces to slam down hard on political and economic grievances."


Demographics and economics are the corpses at the banquet for China. China must keep its economy growing even as its population ages and tens of millions of young Chinese males grow to an adulthood where there are no young Chinese women for them to marry. In the short run this means ensuring access to overseas resources (i.e., open sea lanes) no subject to any other nation's interference. In the long run there may be no easy answers.


"Riots and bombings, more common in the rural area, have moved into the cities. These acts don’t directly threaten the Socialist Dictatorship, but they do alarm the Communist hierarchy which uses ’social management’ like internet censorship and police presence to neutralize any threats. And these are not just a few incidents. When China does something, the word ‘big’ almost always enters the picture."


So they're like Texas that way.


"To keep their economy going, China needs resources and oil. This strategy is in line with their overall quest to extend Chinese PLAN (People’s Liberation Army Navy) influence well beyond their traditional coastal defense imperative. Oil lies in the disputed islands of the South China Sea and vast natural gas reserves lie under the Senkaku Islands controlled by Japan but disputed by Chinese nationalists encouraged by Beijing. Influence. Energy. Territory. The only direction for them to go is outward. And the next logical step is the 4.5 sovereign acres of national territory that can move anywhere. An Aircraft Carrier."


An aircraft carrier battle group is the platform for sea-based force projection centered from anywhere you're able to sail it. It's like having your own fortified, nuclear-capable mobile island.


Thursday, June 23, 2011

re: "We were all fooled by the “floating hotel” cover story, weren’t we?"

Murdoc at Murdoc Online ("my quasi-journalistic weblog with military news commanding the greater part of my attention") asks a more-or-less rhetorical question.


Money quote(s):



"It was sold by the Ukraine to China on the condition that it never be used as a warship."


I'm shocked, SHOCKED, to learn that China is welching on the terms of the deal. You could knock me over with a fender.


Pray they do not alter it any further.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

re: "North Korean Embassy Running An Illegal Casino On The Side"

Niccolo Machiavelli at Big Peace shows us how other countries pay for their embassy operations.



Money quote(s):



"Who says the North Koreans don’t understand capitalism?"



Clearly they get capitalism.



(It's those pesky human rights that have them absolutely stumped.)



"The casino and the Embassy proper are separated by a fence, and only guests with bookings can enter. The casino has four roulette tables on the second floor, five poker and blackjack tables and around 30 slot machines, while the third floor is reserved for VIP guests.



Russia banned casinos in major cities in July 2009, sending casino operators underground and prompting them to rent buildings belonging to foreign governments in a bid to take advantage of their extraterritorial status.



Citing experts, Izvestia said there is no way North Korean diplomats were unaware that their building was being used as a casino, and it is likely that it connived as a means to earn foreign currency for the regime.”"



I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!