Living the Dream.





Showing posts with label deployments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deployments. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

re: "The EagleSpeak Suggested Way to Reduce the Military Force"

at EagleSpeak ("The main focus of this blog is maritime security. Other matters may appear.") wondered where some of these people have been hiding for the past decade.
Money quote(s):
"There will come a time, soon probably, that there will be a call to reduce the
size of the military services (excluding the Coast Guard, which is too damn
small anyway). I offer up my thoughts on how to approach the problem in
two steps:
Identify every member of the military* who has not received combat pay** for
any of the last 10 years that we have been at war.
Once these people have been identified, fire them. If they are flag
officers, fire them twice.
"
You'll get no argument from me on this.
_____
* Who has at least 10 years service
** Meaning "imminent danger pay" or
submarine pay and/or whatever AF missileers get.


8/30


Thursday, April 12, 2012

re: "Kandahar"

Dr. Jerry Pournelle at Chaos Manor ("The Original Blog and Daybook") examined unintended longterm consequences.

Money quote(s):

"The average Army deployment is supposed to be one year, but the effective deployment period has been 15 months since 2007. That is a long time to be in a combat zone. In World War II once one was sent overseas it was generally for the duration, but there were some periods of relief from combat: not just R&R away from the front – there was, after all, a front – but in transport between operations. There were some secure zones in Italy and later in France, because by that time USAAF had established effective air superiority, and the civilian population wasn’t hostile. In Iraq and Afghanistan even our fortresses and enclaves are not really safe. Being in one of our enclaves is not quite the same as being in a trench in the Battle of the Sarne, but it is certainly more stressful than being in operations out on some lonely atoll during our Pacific war in 1943.

Stress and its results are among the costs of long wars fought with professional soldiers. Conscripts in a democracy generally can’t be kept deployed that long. Volunteer troops can be and are. Long term deployments in danger zones are stressful."

"But they volunteered!" is not an answer, nor does it cure the ills to which the flesh (and the mind) is vulnerable.

"I note that one of the answers given to Congressional inquiry on justifications for deployment of US troops without a formal declaration of war is international authorizations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=5zNwOeyuG84 Of course this has been true since the Korean War.

The American way of war has been all-out effort after a war is declared. That view was reinforced after our experiments in the Philippines – a nation building effort that was partially successful, but at a very high cost. “Let him never dream that his bullet’s scream went wide of its island mark, Home to the heart of his darling land where she stumbled and sinned in the dark.” We returned to the American War (sic) of War after that, but the return was eroded after Korea under what was perceived as the new international condition. The Cold War continued, but when it ended we found ourselves in the Balkans, with the troops unable to know who were the good guys, who the bad, or what the devil we were doing over there, and why the United States. We widened the gap with Russia, but for what object we never knew.

President George H W Bush rightly understood the costs of a long term involvement on the ground in the Middle East. I thought the first Gulf War a mistake – better we should spend the money developing our resources and winning independence from the Middle East – but at least we got in and got out again.

Then came the second Gulf War and the occupation of Iraq, followed by victory in Afghanistan and following that quick victory a long expedition without clear objectives." (Bold typeface added for emphasis. - CAA.)

Go big or go home.

This has been CAA's concern about Afghanistan (and Iraq) since before the Second Gulf War began: that the U.S. would engage in a long-term "nation building" effort in either or both places for which it simply does not have the national or political attention span to see to a successful conclusion.

3/12

Thursday, March 29, 2012

re: "Army Linguists: Too Few and Poorly Utilized"

James Joyner at Outside the Beltway ("an online journal of politics and foreign affairs analysis") examined a report of how the Army mis-utilizes its linguists.


Money quote(s):


"Big Army, which is essentially the entire force minus special ops types, is a very strange bureaucracy with little understanding of how to use unique assets. No private should be treated differently than another and it would cause resentment if Specialist Rosenthal, the only guy in the unit who spoke Arabic, were spared the guard duty, KP, and shit details (in the case of deployments to desert environments, quite literally) the other lower enlisted soldiers pulled. Naturally, too, he needs to partake of all the same common task training and Infantry skills as the rest of the boys. Keeping his Arabic skills up to speed, well, that’s something he should do on his own time."


CAA is not utterly unfamiliar with this phenomenon. An old and dear friend, now a highly-paid and respected linguist "at a government agency in the Baltimore-Washington corridor" told me about being a young French linguist freshly graduated from the Defense Language Institute and arriving at Fort Hood, Texas, where he spent the remainder of his active duty enlistment washing trucks.


As a military intelligence soldier deployed to Iraq, CAA was in a unit well-stocked with language-designated (and qualified) soldiers, none of whom knew much Arabic, Kurdish, or Farsi (the three languages which would have been useful to us). We were, however, fully competent in our non-language related skill-sets so, once we were sufficiently augmented with linguists (both uniformed and contractor) we successfully carried out our missions.


I suspect that the young soldier whose account Mr. Joyner excerpts was one of those sorts of usefully-languaged soldiers sent to augment a unit whose other, Korean language-qualified, soldiers were more useful in that organizations more usual mission roles. That is, they were probably in a unit which either deployed to Iraq from their bases in Korea or from bases where there unit had a significant "reinforce Korea" mission, such as in Hawaii.


8/25

Thursday, July 21, 2011

WSJ - While My Son Serves

Dave Shiflett at the Walls Street Journal's "The Saturday Essay" is the father of a deployed soldier. He describes what that's like.


Money quote(s):


"What's it like seeing a family member off to Iraq, and perhaps beyond?


The question comes up regularly these days as our 26-year-old son prepares to ship out. Kids in our middle-class world tend to head for college or for the sort of job that eventually convinces them that college isn't such a bad idea after all. Some friends wonder how our son ended up a sergeant in the Army National Guard.


"Sarge" (as we call him now) didn't volunteer because of family influence. We are Virginians and have served, but only when called. The Vietnam War ended before I got called up, but my father was a World War II navigator in the Naval Air Corps, transporting troops from Hawaii to Guam, and Sarge's grandfather on the other side was in a front-line artillery unit in Korea. A century before, the man I was named after did some surveillance work for Robert E. Lee, and in something of that spirit, our son became an Army Scout.

He is, to be sure, a good demographic fit: Over two-thirds of our armed forces are white, most are male, and Southerners continue to be well-represented in the ranks."


Just to be clear for the statistically-challenged: that means nearly a third of our armed forces are not white, many are female, and yankees could step up to the plate a bit more.


"New acquaintances sometimes seem shocked to meet someone with a deployed family member. "I'm so sorry," is their typical response. You'd almost think the lad was heading into rehab or entering the slave trade. Others simply have no experience with the phenomenon of military service. At a Christmas party a few years ago, a colleague told me, very earnestly, that I was the only person he knew with someone in the military and that my son (whom he had never met) was his only link to that world.

Sheldon Kelly, an old family friend who served with the 82nd Airborne and whose own son has done multiple tours, recalls a lunch in Washington, D.C., with professional friends when the Iraq war was at a high point. "They were all war hawks," he recalled, "but when I told them my son was in Iraq, they were stunned. It was like I was in a different class." None, he added, had children in the military.
"


My own parents reported something similar. While Dad's a Vietnam veteran (not Vietnam era, Vietnam War) and Mom's an Army brat herself (Grandpa fought in the Philippines and survived a brutal POW experience), in suburban retirement they found that, for many of their peers, I was their only connection with service in Iraq.


(Upon my return from Iraq, I found myself considerably annoyed at all the removeable magnetic "Support The Troops" yellow ribbons. Removeable?)


In fairness, that particular country-club set rallied themselves into more substantive support of wounded patients (and their families) recovering at Walter Reed Army and Bethesda Naval hospitals. And I myself was the beneficiary of considerble care package support from folks I barely knew, and prayers from congretations in towns and cities I've never visited. So there's that.


"Deployment also cured me of a lingering cable-TV habit. Whatever patience I once had for the chattering class—make that the braying class—disappeared. I don't know what is worse: raving about how our soldiers are "mercenaries" or hearing a parlor patriot (go get 'em, boys!) suggest that because recent conflicts are "low-casualty" (compared with Vietnam, Korea and the world wars), they are nothing to get worked up about. As my friend Sheldon pointed out, it does seem that the people with the biggest heart for war never seem to have any blood on the line."


If you don't have skin in the game, then it's not commitment, just a sort-of involvement. As for cable TV, I stopped watching news television (other than Fox) during the redeployment homeward from Iraq. MSNBC and CNN didn't seem to be reporting on the same war I'd just left, at least not even as honestly as Al-Jazeera; only Fox seemed to be actually supporting the troops.


(And troops notice these things. As Dr. Pournelle likes to repeat: Beware the anger of the legions.)


"Deployment can also be a positive experience for soldiers. After returning home, our son said that "when I'm out in the desert, I feel like I'm doing what I'm supposed to be doing." Sometimes you have to travel 7,000 miles to find a sense of purpose, and many men, I suspect, may come to wish they had made a similar journey.


It's my impression that men like me, who never served, often feel that we've missed out on an important part of life. We don't know what it's like to be young and far away from home, vulnerable to instant personal extinction but also part of the comradeship that such danger creates. In this sense my son's service is a far greater thing than I have ever done.


Back home from deployments, soldiers can experience a vast array of problems, from nervousness while driving under an overpass (ambush?) or in traffic (since cars in today's war zones can carry bombs)"


Madam-at-Arms still doesn't like how I drive after coming home from Iraq most of a decade ago. But having lived (as diplomats) in the Third World, I believe she's come to appreciate why I kept things like first-aid kits, various tools, &tc. in the Arms-mobile, as well as why I always kept the tank at least half full.


_____



Hat tip to Kathryn Jean Lopez at National Review Online.



Wednesday, May 18, 2011

re: "My Plan on How to Fight the Next Middle East War"

Frank J. Fleming at PajamasMedia ("exclusive news and opinion 24/7 with correspondents in over forty countries") is thinking about Grand Strategy.



Money quote(s):



"War is hell … if you’re in the war. For everyone else, it’s the whining that gets to us. The constant calls of “quagmire” and how everyone is dying for nothing and that we’re only making things worse and how we’re wasting money (yeah, the left used to pretend to care about that) really wear on us. I don’t know how our troops are doing with all the deployments, but all the civilians seem worn out from only hearing about war. We’re all war weary — despite most of us not being directly affected by any of the combat. Maybe our troops can handle getting shot at and going on multiple deployments just fine, but we can’t deal with the civilians complaining about it all the time."



Remember this?



"Obviously avoiding wars in the Middle East is not a realistic option, and I’m sure we’ll get involved in plenty more in the future. So how can we do that and avoid the constant whining of dumb hippies and having all those useless countries in Europe call us warmongers? Well, think back to the Iraq War and when people really started to viciously complain about it. We had broad support going in, and people were still pretty up on it during the initial bombing campaign and even once we got to the point of pulling down the Saddam statue. People truly started getting angry, and the “Bush=Hitler” signs came out in full force, when we stayed and tried to help.



Bombing a country is nothing, but hanging around the country afterward, helping it rebuild and establish a system of government where the citizens don’t get bossed around by a homicidal dictator, gets us into trouble. And it is pretty difficult for the troops; it requires them to stand out there exposed among the populace instead of just running around in tanks and exploding stuff. Plus it takes a long time, during which there will be constant whining about it, especially if there are Republicans in office to blame. The left basically collaborated with the insurgents in Iraq, saying, “Hey, if you kill more troops, then we will scream even louder about how awful this war is and hopefully get Bush out of office. So help us out here!”"



You have to love Frank J. He has a plain-spoken way of saying what he thinks and making it accessible.



"So I ask: Why should we even stay and help a country after we’ve bombed it?



Think about it. When President Bush gave that famous speech on the aircraft carrier in front of the “Mission Accomplished” banner, we could have just left the war then and said we won, and who could have argued with us? If you can go to a country, blow stuff up, and leave unscathed, that sounds like success. If someone came and burned your house and walked away, you wouldn’t say you won because the guy left. So why shouldn’t we in a future conflict in a Middle Eastern country just blow up stuff, declare victory, and leave?"



This is what's called a punitive expedition or war. Because its purpose is to punish. And that's it.



____



Hat tip to Frank J. at IMAO ("Unfair. Unbalanced. Unmedicated.").



Wednesday, April 14, 2010

re: "U.S. military goes hungry in Afghanistan"

This Digital Journal article came up yesterday in a Facebook comment thread, and I'd like to share some of my contributions to the discussion.

1. "I saw this article the other day. Essentially the current surge of troops to Afghanistan is stretching (and sometimes outstripping) the capabilities of our logistics and supply system. This happens in war sometimes. It sounds very much like conditions in Iraq during the first rotation (OIF 1, 2003-4).

I was there. Sometimes there wasn't enough food or water, and there wasn't any "housing" to speak of.

It doesn't mean that the president or the theatre commander are bad, wrong or evil. It means it's a war zone and sometimes things suck. Sometimes they suck a lot, but the troops aren't in garrison anymore and can rough it as needed.

War sucks. Write that down somewhere....

This makes the recent decision to shut down a lot of MWR and fast-food venues seem a lot more sensible."

2. "In case that's not clear, what I mean is that supplying all those MWR and fast-food venues eats up shipping space, storage capacity, and increases the number of "support" personnel burdening each base and the "system" as a whole. You have to look past the initial reaction of "if the chow hall doesn't have enough food, at least the troops could go to Burger King" since it all comes through the same trucks, air freight, and shipping lines of supply. Not quite a zero-sum game but close enough."

3. "We all want the best for our troops. I lost 30 lbs. during my year in Iraq (but I was coming out from behind a civilian desk job to deploy as a reservist), which wasn't all bad. My company had nowhere near enough tentage for both operations and billeting when we were deployed to a tactical assembly area so we spent weeks with our cots sitting in moon dust underneath non-issued tarps and ponchos we strung from the side of our humvee trailers. Food was MREs except when we ran mail and supply runs back to the logistical support areas where there were mess halls."

&

4. "By way of example."


Tuesday, April 6, 2010

S&S - Flight surgeon threatens to refuse deployment over Obama birth certificate flap

From my archive of press clippings:

Stars and Stripes

Flight surgeon threatens to refuse deployment over Obama birth certificate flap

By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes

Mideast edition, Saturday, April 3, 2010

WASHINGTON — An Army flight surgeon could face reprimand or dismissal from the service after stating in an online video that he’ll refuse deployment to Afghanistan because of concerns he has about President Barack Obama’s birth certificate.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, chief of primary care for the Pentagon’s health clinic, released a statement through the American Patriot Foundation saying his decision is based on “pursuit of the truth about the president’s eligibility under the constitution to hold office.”

Army officials said Lakin has not yet violated any direct orders, but his statements have been brought to commanders’ attention for review."

&

"Lakin, an 18-year soldier, last served overseas in 2005 during a tour with the 3rd Squadron, 4th Cavalry Squadron, 25th Infantry Division in Afghanistan.

Questions surrounding Obama’s birth certificate surfaced during the 2008 election, but were largely put to rest after Hawaii officials confirmed his American citizenship and the campaign released a copy of the document."

Guys, he was nominated, he ran, he won. The only way he's leaving office now short of completing his term is if he resigns or is impeached.

This is not a hill to die on, a sword to fall upon, career-wise.

_____
(Yeah, I know there're at least two other ways but spelling them out will only encourage the unruly.)

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

S&S - Judge dismisses Ind. Guard suit against KBR over chemical exposure

From my archive of press clippings:

Stars and Stripes

Judge dismisses Ind. Guard suit against KBR over chemical exposure

By Travis J. Tritten, Stars and Stripes

Stars and Stripes Online Edition, Friday, February 26, 2010

A federal judge on Thursday dismissed a lawsuit brought by 47 Indiana National Guard soldiers who claim the military contractor KBR failed to protect them from exposure to a potent carcinogen during a 2003 deployment to Iraq.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"The case was dismissed in the Southern District of Indiana because the court does not have jurisdiction over KBR, which is headquartered in Houston and has no offices in the state, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Young wrote in his ruling, a copy of which was obtained by Stars and Stripes.

Young’s ruling did not address the validity of claims the contractor hid the existence and risks of hexavalent chromium at the Qarmat Ali water treatment facility from Guard members, who provided security during restoration of the facility.

The claims will be filed soon in another federal court jurisdiction, plaintiffs’ attorney Mike Doyle said in a statement."

"Hundreds of Guard members from Indiana, Oregon, West Virginia and South Carolina were notified last year that they might have been exposed to the carcinogen while securing Qarmat Ali during summer 2003, according to the U.S. Army."

&

"Guard members said they came down with chronic bloody noses and sickness while at Qarmat Ali and still suffer illnesses.

KBR denies it hid the existence and health hazards of the anti-corrosive, which is being phased out by the Department of Defense in coming years due to health and environmental risks."

Sunday, January 3, 2010

S&S - Lawmakers seek better job security for guardsmen, reservists

Stars and Stripes

Lawmakers seek better job security for guardsmen, reservists


By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes

Mideast edition, Saturday, April 25, 2009


WASHINGTON — Lawmakers on Tuesday pushed for stronger legal protection for guardsmen and reservists looking to return to their civilian jobs without penalty after mobilization, saying the government owes them that security.

Snippet(s):

"That law prohibits employers of guardsmen and reservists from firing them, cutting their pay or changing their benefits when they are called to active-duty service. But veterans groups complain that too often businesses ignore those rules with little or no consequence."

"Davis’ said his bill and companion legislation introduced by Sen. Bob Casey Jr., D-Pa., would add "more teeth" to the existing USERRA rules. The measure would for the first time allow punitive damages in such disputes, instead of limiting reservists to only actual lost wages."

&

"The legislation would also allow USERRA cases against private employers to be heard in state courts, instead of just federal courts. Bocceri said that could dramatically cut down on the typical three-year wait that reservists face in employment disputes.

State governments would also be held to the same standards as private companies under the measure, and wage discrimination related to a reservist’s deployment would be specifically outlawed."

Saturday, May 16, 2009

S&S - Troops in South Korea have new tour option

From my archive of press clippings:

Stars and Stripes

Troops in South Korea have new tour option

By Ashley Rowland, Stars and Stripes

Pacific edition, Sunday, April 12, 2009

SEOUL — Troops in much of South Korea will be able to serve two-year accompanied tours, offering them another option under a new policy that will let more servicemembers bring their families to South Korea, U.S. Forces Korea commander Gen. Walter Sharp announced last week.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"When Sharp announced the tour normalization policy in December, he said troops in northern South Korea, also known as Area 1, would be able to get three-year, command-sponsored tours but did not extend the two-year option to them.

However, under a revised Joint Federal Travel Regulation approved by the Department of Defense on March 2, troops in Pyeongtaek, Osan, Daegu, Chinhae and Seoul can now apply for two- or three-year command-sponsored tours.

Under the tour normalization policy, about half of the 28,500 servicemembers in South Korea eventually will be allowed to bring their families with them.
"

Sunday, May 10, 2009

S&S - Marine tours may change

From my archive of press clippings:

Stars and Stripes


Marine tours may change

Mideast edition, Saturday, April 11, 2009


Marines serving first tours in Japan who have not served in Iraq or Afghanistan may find their two-year deployment cut short, according to a new Marine Corps policy.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"Enlisted Marines scheduled for 24-month assignments on Okinawa or mainland Japan will have their tours re-evaluated after a year and could be transferred six months early, according to the policy, which takes effect May 1."
_____


Stars and Stripes reporters Travis Tritten and Kevin Baron contributed to this report.

Monday, May 4, 2009

S&S - AAFES pulling aspirin from combat zones

Stars and Stripes



AAFES pulling aspirin from combat zones

By Mark Abramson and Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes


Mideast edition, Friday, May 1, 2009

Chris Six / S&S
The Army and Air Force Exchange Service is pulling all products containing aspirin from the shelves at its contingency locations.

Department of Defense officials ordered that aspirin in combat zones be controlled and now prohibit over-the-counter access through AAFES and Morale, Welfare and Recreation activities, an AAFES press release stated.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"In an order written in March by then-Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Ward Casscells, service officials were told to make sure all U.S. troops and civilians headed into combat zones stop taking aspirin at least 10 days before they deploy, unless directed by a health care provider.

The goal of the policy is to minimize blood loss in combat injuries, he wrote, and cut down on the number of "preventable deaths" associated with those wounds.

The concern over aspirin stems from how it affects blood’s ability to clot."

Sunday, May 3, 2009

S&S - Bill would grant early retirement after tours

From my archive of press clippings:

Stars and Stripes

Bill would grant early retirement after tours


By Leo Shane III, Stars and Stripes


Mideast edition, Friday, March 27, 2009


WASHINGTON — Reservists and Guardsmen who have served multiple overseas tours could get early retirement under a measure introduced by a pair of lawmakers Wednesday.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"The bill, sponsored by South Carolina Republican Joe Wilson and Oklahoma Democrat Dan Boren, would allow those troops to collect retirement benefits three months before their 60th birthday for every 90 days they spent activated in support of a contingency operation.

For reservists who served 20 years and spent two 12-month tours in Iraq, that would mean receiving their retirement payouts at 58, instead of waiting the extra two years."

&

"
Congress two years ago approved counting reservists’ time in Iraq and Afghanistan toward an early retirement, but the policy only applied to service after January 2008. Lawmakers dropped a clause to make the benefits retroactive during budget negotiations.


The new measure would make it retroactive to September 2001. Congressional officials projected the backdating could cost $1.8 billion over 10 years, although Boren called that figure misleading.
"

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

S&S - Some Grafenwöhr units will have to move. Relocation of Army support units makes way for four infantry battalions.

Stars and Stripes



Some Grafenwöhr units will have to move


Relocation of Army support units makes way for four infantry battalions


By Seth Robson, Stars and Stripes

European edition, Friday, April 25, 2009

Seth Robson / S&S
Because a planned 300-unit housing area for soldiers and their families in this village of Hütten, near Grafenwöhr, was put on hold, several Army support units will move from Grafenwöhr to other bases in Germany. The move was meant to make way for four Schweinfurt-based infantry battalions.


GRAFENWÖHR, Germany — The scrapping of a 300-home off-post military housing project and the impending arrival of four Schweinfurt-based infantry battalions means several Army support units currently based at Grafenwöhr will have to move to other bases in Germany.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"On Thursday, U.S. Army Garrison Grafenwöhr commander Col. Nils "Chris" Sorenson told a gathering of leaders from German communities surrounding the base about plans to move the battalions to Grafenwöhr next year, after the 172nd Infantry Brigade returns from its yearlong mission to Iraq.

The movement of the battalions, at a time when there is a critical housing shortage at Grafenwöhr, "means some of our small enabling units will go elsewhere," he said. He identified one of the units on the move as the 12th Chemical Company, which is headed to Schweinfurt."

&

"The 172nd Infantry Brigade Headquarters and two battalions assigned to the brigade moved to Grafenwöhr last summer while the brigade’s four other battalions are due to join them next spring, he said.

Many of the additional soldiers and their families were to have moved into a 300-home off-post leased housing area in the nearby town of Hütten, he said. However, that project has been on hold since the German investor in the project — PPREF — declared bankruptcy late last year."

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

S&S - Army shifts another unit to Afghanistan

Stars and Stripes

Army shifts another unit to Afghanistan


Stars and Stripes

Mideast edition, Saturday, April 18, 2009


Another U.S. Army unit is shifting directly from Iraq to Afghanistan, military officials confirmed this week, underscoring an increased emphasis on the Afghan war and the pressures on finding enough troops to fulfill pledges of an increased ground presence.


Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"The 4th Engineer Battalion had spent two weeks in Baghdad before it received orders in March changing its one-year deployment from Iraq to Afghanistan, officials said. They will now be operating in southern Afghanistan, performing route-clearance missions in areas littered with roadside bombs."

Thursday, April 16, 2009

S&S - Reserve, Guard chaplains in demand. Deployments help religious advisers relate to soldiers.

Stars and Stripes

Reserve, Guard chaplains in demand

Deployments help religious advisers relate to soldiers

By Seth Robson, Stars and Stripes

Pacific edition, Friday, April 4, 2009

War-zone deployments for active-duty Army chaplains mean many clergy serving soldiers in the rear are members of the National Guard or Army Reserve.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"Since Sept. 11, 2001, some 2,700 chaplains and chaplain assistants have been called to active duty, according to Lt. Col. Carleton Birch, a spokesman for the Army’s Office of the Chief of Chaplains. "

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

S&S - Awards demonstrate valor of ‘The Rock’

From my archive of press clippings:

Stars and Stripes

Awards demonstrate valor of ‘The Rock’

By Kent Harris, Stars and Stripes

Mideast edition, Sunday, June 29, 2008

Silver Stars awarded to six of unit’s soldiers

Six soldiers assigned to 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment have received Silver Stars during the unit’s tour in Afghanistan. A brief look at their actions, according to the narratives submitted for the awards:

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"Soldiers from "The Rock" have been awarded six Silver Stars.

Forty-eight have earned Bronze Stars with valor.

More than 140 Army Commendation Medals with valor have been approved.

Ninety-eight Purple Hearts have been awarded.

More than 150 other awards for valor have been submitted for approval — including two for the Medal of Honor, three of for the Distinguished Service Cross and three more for Silver Stars."

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

S&S - Reserve chiefs: Our people deserve better retirement

Stars and Stripes

Reserve chiefs: Our people deserve better retirement

By Tom Philpott, Special to Stars and Stripes


Pacific edition, Saturday, March 7, 2009


Reserve and National Guard members deserve a better retirement plan, one that pays an annuity earlier than age 60 at least for those willing to serve longer than 20 years, Reserve leaders have told Congress.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"Reservists might deserve extended health care coverage too, also in recognition of their full operational role in Iraq, Afghanistan and future wars, said some reserve component commanders who testified Tuesday before the House armed services subcommittee on military personnel."

"Current reserve retirement offers little or no incentive for members to serve past 20 years, Stultz said, because longer service doesn’t change the age 60 start of annuities. So it’s hard to persuade members or spouses that another hitch is worth the risk of returning to war or being separated, Stultz explained. He cited a recent conversation with a Guardsman whose skill, truck driver, is dangerous and in demand among units deploying for war."

&

"A law passed in early 2008 does allow earlier retirement than age 60 for Reserve and Guard members with 20 or more years if they deploy for war or national emergency. For every 90 consecutive days they spend mobilized, reservists will see the start date for annuities cut by three months. But Congress made the change effective only for deployment time after Jan. 28, 2008, leaving out many thousands deployed since 9-11.

Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), ranking Republican on the personnel subcommittee, a retired Army reserve officer and father of four children now serving on active duty or in the reserves, has reintroduced a bill (HR 208) to extend last year’s reserve retirement change retroactively to cover mobilizations since 9/11. Another Wilson bill (HR 972) would allow Guard and Reserve member who earn early retirement to receive full TRICARE benefits between the time annuities start and 60."



To comment, e-mail milupdate@aol.com, write to Military Update, P.O. Box 231111, Centreville, VA, 20120-1111 or visit: www.militaryupdate.com.

Monday, March 9, 2009

S&S - Army tests new deployment plan. ‘Reset’ calls for 15 months of dwell time between tours.

From my archive of press clippings:

Stars and Stripes

Army tests new deployment plan

‘Reset’ calls for 15 months of dwell time between tours

By Sandra Jontz, Stars and Stripes

Mideast edition, Sunday, June 22, 2008

VICENZA, Italy — Predictability in times of war is nearly impossible. But a new plan being tested by the Army might change that.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"The "reset" plan, as it’s being called, would not only give troops more time between deployments, but also give them more time in their own beds.

Army leaders have tapped 13 units — eight active duty and five from the reserve component — to test the plan.

If successful it will be implemented throughout the Army in about five years, when the last of the units completes the trial period."

"As the plan currently is written, planning for troops’ return home will begin 180 days before the unit leaves the combat zone, and continue until the unit sets out again — ideally after 15 months of dwell time at home.

In the next few years, planners hope to stretch the dwell time to 24 months before a unit has to again set out for a combat zone"

&

"While "resetting" the Army’s deployment cycle still is years out, units have introduced tangible programs and changes to ease them into back to home life that the soldiers see today.

Army units have many programs to take the soldiers out of the pressure cooker of a war zone.

Returning soldiers, for example, must report to work for the first week they return, but only report for half a day."

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

S&S - Odierno expands Super Bowl beer policy

Stars and Stripes

Odierno expands Super Bowl beer policy


Stars and Stripes

Mideast edition, Sunday, January 18, 2009


The top U.S. military commander in Iraq has expanded an order that originally would have allowed only Baghdad-based U.S. troops to enjoy a couple of beers while watching the Super Bowl.

Read the whole article here.

Snippet(s):

"Gen. Ray Odierno, commander of Multi-National Force–Iraq, issued an expanded waiver to the policy last week, according to military officials.

The change allows all units in Iraq to serve two beers per servicemember during the big game.
Originally, Multi-National Division–Baghdad had received permission to allow its servicemembers two beers each while watching the National Football League’s championship game, which takes place Sunday, Feb. 1 in Tampa, Fla.


Odierno’s order is the first time all servicemembers in Iraq are allowed to break General Order No. 1, which prohibits the possession and consumption of alcohol, among other things."

&

"Previously, units other than MND-Baghdad had declined to follow suit by approving the two beers.

General Order No. 1 has banned U.S. forces from drinking alcohol in Iraq since troops deployed to the Middle East.

There has been at least one previous instance in which units could drink in Iraq, military officials said, but it is not known exactly how many times this has been done in the past.
The beer must be consumed in the dining facility where soldiers can watch the game.
"